Sunday, September 22, 2024
spot_img
HomeFootballFootball doesn’t need rules to clamp down on ingenuity of goalies like...

Football doesn’t need rules to clamp down on ingenuity of goalies like Emiliano Martinez

ALSO READ | How Data Analytics changed football scouting

This is how goalkeeping rules have evolved over the years, as a reaction to a goalkeeper’s ingenuity, (or shrewd manipulation of laws).

Goalkeepers have, broadly speaking, been the most frequent victims of amendments to the Laws of the Game. After the position was formally introduced in 1870, they more or less ran free, until gradual changes began to gnaw away at their privileges. In 1873, they were no longer allowed to carry the ball upfield; in 1887 they were banned from handling it in the opposition half and finally, in 1912, they were permitted only to handle the ball inside their own penalty area, and in 2000 they could no longer hold the ball for more than six seconds for a goal kick.

The latest tweak, constituted in March and effective from this month, takes another entitlement away. It states that “the defending goalkeeper must remain on the goal line, facing the kicker, between the goalposts, without touching the goalposts, crossbar or goal net, until the ball is kicked.”

Besides,“the goalkeeper must not behave in a manner that fails to show respect for the game and the opponent, i.e. by unfairly distracting the kicker.”

It implies that goalkeepers could no longer spread their arms before the kick so as to make the target area look smaller, to sow confusion as where to strike the ball and how to strike the ball. They cannot practice the common ritual of touching the posts before they brace for the shot, they cannot delay the execution of the kick, and most significantly, they can’t indulge in shenanigans. How would Andrew Redmayne, whose wobble-limbed antics, helped Australia beat Peru in the World Cup playoff, take this?

Restricting freedom

Advertisement

Most certainly, referees should ensure that goalkeepers, or any player on the field, should not cross the line of sportsmanship. But in cruelly restricting their freedom of movement, they are moulding human robots out of them. The goalpost itself is a cage; and now they would feel even more caged. The word “distraction” though is so ambiguous and indefinite that goalkeepers would certainly find a way around it.

ALSO READ | Why Cristiano Ronaldo, back in a starring role for Portugal, can sparkle in Euro and next World Cup

On the contrary, no one is preventing the penalty-taker from stuttering or stopping in his run-up, or delaying the shot, or playing tricks with the eye and body. He could be an equally distracting, disrupting entity as well. He could play mind-games too.

It’s apparently the actions of Argentina’s mercurial goal-keeper Emiliano Martinez’s theatrics in the COPA America semifinal against Colombia as well as the World Cup final encounter against France that prompted the hasty stitching up of the clause. He would subject each opposition penalty taker to a barrage of trash talk.

Advertisement

At the World Cup, apart from the regular verbal barrage, he would rather than handing the ball to the taker, would toss it to one side, forcing an unwanted detour to reach the penalty spot. He was brandished a card, but he remained uninhibited. Neither did the implementation of the new rules bother him “I already saved the penalties that I had to save,” he dismissed with his characteristic dismissiveness.

Thankless role

Some of his contemporaries would feel condemned. As such, the occupation is as torturous and thankless, remembered for one mistake and forgotten for a thousand saves, even though a save could be worth as much as a goal. In a sense, their careers are spent operating on the edge of failure.

ALSO READ | With treble secured, Pep Guardiola breathes soul into Manchester City’s petrodollars

In contrast with their team-mates, goalkeepers cannot make amends for their mistakes by going up to the other end and scoring, apart from a few exceptions. Commit an error and expect to be pulled apart by both public and pundits.

Even a so-called quiet day could take its toll on them, Kasper Schmeichel had once put the reality in perspective: “There are thousands of things that go into a clean sheet. And the amount of times I’ve come off the pitch, not having made a save, but having had a throbbing headache because you concentrated like you’ve never concentrated before. Continually talking, guiding. And that one’s a real cliché like: ‘Oh quiet day for him today, the perfect game’, but they don’t fully appreciate the intricacies of goalkeeping.”

There are other perils and hazards. A lone mistimed tackle or a foul could concede a penalty., worse could end their night, could incite a long suspension. Skulls and elbows could clatter into your chest and head, you could fall most awkwardly, you could clang your head against the post. Even the balls are designed to enhance the cutting edge of goal-scorers. They are quicker than ever before, they are prone to swerving more alarmingly too. Little wonder then that one of the finest net-minders in the game, Gianluigi Buffon, feels that “in the end, you need to be a little masochistic to be a goalkeeper.”

Advertisement

“A masochist and egocentric as well. A masochist because when you play in goal, you know the only certain thing in life is that you will concede goals. And you also know that conceding goals is not something that brings you happiness,” he once told The Guardian.

So he advises the wannabe goalkeepers. “Change. Don’t be a keeper.’ Until his teenage years, Buffon wanted to be a goal-keeping midfielder like his idols Marco Tardelli and Nicola Berti. But Italia 1990 changed it all. Cameron’s goalkeeper Thomas N’Kono, who would bound out of the six-yard box in grey and yellow striped shirt and black trousers and thunder the ball upfield, enthused him.

Advertisement Top Sports News Now

Click here for more

Buffon emerged as one of the finest, yet he never won a Ballon d’Or. In fact, Lev Yashin remains the only goalkeeper ever to have won the award. During the transfer, they are always the bargain buys. They are transferred for less and paid less. Only two goalkeepers have ever commanded a fee in excess of 50 million pounds, Chelsea’s Kepa Arrizabalaga and Liverpool’s Alisson Becker. They don’t earn as much as others, even if their roles are diversifying, they are expected to initiate the play, to play-make, use their feet with as much expertise as they use their hands. Treble-winning Manchester City’s first-choice keeper gets £100,000 pounds a week, but is the fifteenth highest earner in the squad. The best paid goalkeeper was Manchester United’s David de Ge (£375,000-a-week) but he is not even in the top 15. Only nine keepers in the world have a weekly wage more £150,000 pounds.

Also Read'When we meet Australia, we would need higher levels than what we face in…Football doesn’t need rules to clamp down on ingenuity of goalies like Emiliano Martinez1Watch: Lionel Messi mural gets finishing touch from David Beckham before …Football doesn’t need rules to clamp down on ingenuity of goalies like Emiliano Martinez2'Cristiano Ronaldo does not want me to join him at Al-Nassr': Former Juve…Football doesn’t need rules to clamp down on ingenuity of goalies like Emiliano Martinez3Mohun Bagan, East Bengal headed for Durand Cup showdown in season's first…

Little wonder then that goalkeepers tend to be eccentric, prone to showmanship and eccentricities. But one by one, the colour is being taken away from them. From Roose to Buffon, Yashin to Ederson, they would feel condemned to the edges of the game.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments